Search News and Information

Custom Search

December 31, 2007

Oklahoma City may improve arena to lure Sonics

This is good news for George Shin and his Hornets. When New Orleans picks between public money going to the Saints or the Hornets (word is it isn't both, and it isn't the Hornets) then there will be a remodeled arena and new practice facility waiting in Oklahoma City for when the Hornets return.
Read the twist of the story here. OKC is voting on remodeling the Ford Center for an NBA team. Shin has as much right to apply to move there, maybe more, than Clay Bennett. Shin is dealing with a natural disaster that happened in a bad market, Bennett is dealing with his man made disaster of his own doing in a good market that he's trying to make to look bad.


Have a great day,
Mr Baker

Sent from my iPhone

December 24, 2007

2. Guarding an Opponent. Rule 12, B. Personal Foul

SEATTLE - There are good fouls, and bad fouls. Each team should be able to maximize the right kind of foul, and minimize giving away points and possessions.

Players have a right to "any spot on the floor". Players also have the right to occupy a spot another player may covet, that is, beat your man to "his" spot. There are places on the floor where contact can be made of a type by the defender. Post players forget they can't put a hand on front of a player at the top of the circle, guards and wing players forget that they can hold position below the freethrow line with a forearm, and more in the lower box. I see a lot of players asking referees why two plays look the same but a foul was called in only one instance. It isn't always the ref, or some superstar call, but a matter of where on the floor the contact was made, and the form the contact took.


Long story, longer, a good foul to me is not one foul, but 16 of them. A team could commit 16 fouls in a game and not send the other team to the freethrow line, and not turn the ball over to the other team. Another team could commit 16 fouls in a game and send the other team to the freethrow line all 16 times, and/or turn the ball over. (to oversimplify) Commit 4 fouls a quarter, not in the last two minutes of regulation, or overtime, not on the offensive end of the floor, not while the opponent is in the act of shooting, don't swing an elbow, and you too can see why veteran teams look like they get away with murder and yet don't get beat at the freethrow line. The foul "on the floor" is the mark of hard defensive pressure applied by a defender at the right time, on the catch, or on the dribble, driving through a screen with enough force to knock a bigman down (you floppers).
Every team employs some hacking at the end of games to attempt to stop the clock, force two freethrows and hope to score three points on the other end of the floor. This rarely works, but is the tactic of last resort. So, you will see every team give away some freethrows.

So, what teams commit the fewest fouls per game (n order), and how many free throw attempts do they give up?
Team PF, Opp FTA
Spurs 18.5, 20.2
Suns 18.6, 21.9
Hornets 19.4, 19.8
Wizards (they have other problems) 19.8, 23.6
Grizzlies 19.9, 22.4
Blazers 20.0, 20.9
Pistons 20.3, 25.0
Rockets 20.6, 25.8

These teams are not going to give the game away at the freethrow line. They may give it away in other ways. Once you get beyond 19 PF a lot of other things are going on. The Pistons are fouling and not giving you the easy hoop, you may get them at the line, but it is going to hurt. Spurs, Suns, Hornets, are contesting motion on the dribble and away fro the ball.

The difference between the fewest PF 18.5 and the most 24.8 is not as great as the difference between fewest FT attempts 21.3 and the most 29.6. There is a point where fouling works for you, and where it works against you, I contend that it is possible to foul 16 times a game and not give up a single attempt. Most teams are shooting around 72% to 75%, the easiest points to be had, limit fouls, limit attempts, and force the opponent to score in harder ways.

Stats as of 12/26/07

Tonight, 12/27/07, Sonics lost 96-104. The Sonics committed 23 fouls, the Celtics 15. The Sonics attempted 23 freethrows, the Celtics 36. Celtics were blazing hot from the 3 point line, but limit the freethrow attempts and it would have been anybody's game. Fouling Paul Pierce on his way to the basket s worse than fouling him on his way to receive the pass to begin the play.
Don't contest the shot, contest the play before the shot.

For the technical description see NBA.com
See Fouls and Penalties.
B. Personal Foul
Section I--Types
a. A player shall not hold, push, charge into, impede the progress of an oppo-nent by extending a hand, forearm, leg or knee or by bending the body into a posi-tion that is not normal. Contact that results in the re-routing of an opponent is a foul which must be called immediately.
b. Contact initiated by the defensive player guarding a player with the ball is not legal. This contact includes, but is not limited to, forearm, hands, or body check.
EXCEPTIONS:
(1) A defender may apply contact with a forearm to an offensive player with the ball who has his back to the basket below the free throw line extend-ed outside the Lower Defensive Box.
(2) A defender may apply contact with a forearm and/or one hand with a bent elbow to an offensive player in a post-up position with the ball in the Lower Defensive Box.
(3) A defender may apply contact with a forearm to an offensive player with the ball at any time in the Lower Defensive Box. The forearm in the above exceptions is solely for the purpose of main-taining a defensive position.
(4) A defender may position his leg between the legs of an offensive player in a post-up position in the Lower Defensive Box for the purpose of main-taining defensive position. If his foot leaves the floor in an attempt to dis-lodge his opponent, it is a foul immediately.
(5) Incidental contact with the hand against an offensive player shall be ignored if it does not affect the player's speed, quickness, balance and/or rhythm.
c. Any player whose actions against an opponent cause illegal contact with yet another opponent has committed the personal foul.
d. A personal foul committed by the offensive team during a throw-in shall be an offensive foul, regardless of whether the ball has been released.
e. Contact which occurs on the hand of the offensive player, while that hand is in contact with the ball, is legal.
EXCEPTION: Flagrant, elbow and punching fouls.
PENALTIES: The offender is charged with a personal foul. The offended team is charged with a team foul if the illegal contact was caused by the defender. There is no team foul if there are personal fouls on one member of each team or the per- sonal foul is against an offensive player. The offended team is awarded:
(1) the ball out-of-bounds on the sideline at the nearest spot where play was interrupted but no nearer to the baseline than the free throw line extend-ed if an offensive foul is assessed.
(2) the ball out-of-bounds on the sideline where play was interrupted but no nearer to the baseline than the free throw line extended if the personal foul is on the defender and if the penalty situation is not in effect.
(3) one free throw attempt if the personal foul is on the defender and there is a successful field goal or free throw on the play.
(4) two/three free throw attempts if the personal foul is on the defender and the offensive player is in the act of shooting an unsuccessful field goal.
(5) one free throw attempt plus a penalty free throw attempt if the personal foul is on the defender and the offensive player is not in the act of attempting a field goal if the penalty situation is in effect.
(6) one free throw attempt and possession of the ball on the sideline nearest the spot where play was interrupted if an offensive player, or a teammate, is fouled while having a clear-path-to-the-basket. The ball and an offen-sive player must be positioned between the tip-of-circle extended in the backcourt and the basket in the frontcourt, with no defender between the ball and the basket when the personal foul occurs. There must be team control and the new play must originate in the backcourt, including throw-ins, and the offended team must be deprived of an opportunity to score an uncontested basket.
(7) two free throw attempts if the personal foul is for illegal contact with an elbow. The elbow foul may be assessed whether the ball is dead or alive. Free throw attempts are awarded whether the ball is dead, alive, loose or away-from-the-play in the last two minutes of regulation or overtime(s). Contact must occur for an elbow foul to be assessed. It is an unsports-manlike act whether or not there is contact. (See Rule 12A--Section VII-- d(6) for non-contact.) If the deliberate elbow contact is above shoulder level, the player will be ejected. If the elbow contact is shoulder level or below, the player may be ejected at the discretion of the official. In all of these situations, the official has the discretion of assessing a fla-grant foul (1) or (2).
(8) two free throw attempts if a personal foul is committed by a defender prior to the ball being released on a throw-in.
EXCEPTION: Rule 12B--Section X.
(9) two free throw attempts if a personal foul is committed against an offen-sive player without the ball when his team has at least a one-man advan-tage on a fast break and the defensive player takes a foul to stop play.

Section II--By Dribbler
a. A dribbler shall not (1) charge into an opponent who has established a legal guarding position, or (2) attempt to dribble between two opponents, or (3) attempt to dribble between an opponent and a boundary, where sufficient space is not avail-able for illegal contact to be avoided.
b. If a defender is able to establish a legal position in the straight line path of the dribbler, the dribbler must avoid contact by changing direction or ending his dribble.
c. The dribbler must be in control of his body at all times. If illegal contact occurs, the responsibility is on the dribbler.
PENALTY: The offender is assessed an offensive foul. There is no team foul. The ball is awarded to the offended team on the sideline nearest the spot where play was interrupted but no nearer to the baseline than the free throw line extended.
EXCEPTION: Rule 3--Section I--a.
d. If a dribbler has sufficient space to have his head and shoulders in advance of his defender, the responsibility for illegal contact is on the defender.
e. If a dribbler has established a straight line path, a defender may not crowd him out of that path.
PENALTY: The defender shall be assessed a personal foul and a team foul. If the penalty is not in effect, the offended team is awarded the ball on the sideline nearest the spot where play was interrupted but no nearer to the baseline than the free throw line extended. If the penalty is in effect, one free throw attempt plus a penalty free throw attempt is awarded.

Section III--By Screening
A player who sets a screen shall not (1) assume a position nearer than a nor-mal step from an opponent, if that opponent is stationary and unaware of the screen-er's position, or (2) make illegal contact with an opponent when he assumes a posi-tion at the side or front of an opponent, or (3) assume a position so near to a moving opponent that illegal contact cannot be avoided by the opponent without changing direction or stopping, or (4) move laterally or toward an opponent being screened, after having assumed a legal position. The screener may move in the same direction and path of the opponent being screened. In (3) above, the speed of the opponent being screened will determine what the screener's stationary position may be. This position will vary and may be one to two normal steps or strides from his opponent.

See Rule: Guarding an Opponent, and remember that they call those little players "guards" for a reason that appears to be lost on many players, and the game itself.
2. Guarding an Opponent
In all guarding situations, a player is entitled to any spot on the court he desires, provided he legally gets to that spot first and without contact with an opponent. If a defensive or offensive player has established a position on the floor and his opponent initiates contact that results in the dislodging of the opponent, a foul should be called IMMEDIATELY.

During all throw-ins, the defensive player(s) must be allowed to take a position between his man and the basket.

A player may continue to move after gaining a guarding position in the path of an opponent provided he is not moving directly or obliquely toward his opponent when contact occurs. A player is never permitted to move into the path of an opponent after the opponent has jumped into the air.

A player who extends a hand, forearm, shoulder, hip or leg into the path of an opponent and thereby causes contact is not considered to have a legal position in the path of an opponent.

A player is entitled to a vertical position even to the extent of holding his arms above his shoulders, as in post play or when double-teaming in pressing tactics.

Any player who conforms to the above is absolved from responsibility for any contact by an opponent which may dislodge or tend to dislodge such player from the position which he has attained and is maintaining legally. If contact occurs, the official must decide whether the contact is incidental or a foul has been committed.

Scott Skiles: Former Bulls Coach, as of today

SEATTLE - The Chicago Bulls fired Scott Skiles.

Chicago Bulls Executive Vice President of Basketball Operations John Paxson today announced that Scott Skiles has been relieved of his duties as the team’s head coach.

In a statement released this morning, Paxson said: “This was a difficult decision to make, but one that was necessary at this time. Scott helped us in many ways during his time with the Bulls; most importantly, he helped this franchise get back to respectability. I am appreciative of his hard work and the imprint that he left on our team.”


So, did the conversation go something like this:
Paxson: Stop imprinting on this team.
Skiles: That's why you hired me.
Paxon: There once was a man named Chuck Knox... nevermind, pack your knives.

Good coaches get fired, it happens.

Sonics Assign Mo Sene to Idaho D-League Team

SEATTLE - The Seattle Supersonics are sending second year center Mo Sene to their D-League team, the Idaho Stampede.

Sonics News release, 12/23/2007

Sene is a project center the is limited in his growth by a lack of playing time, time he was not getting on the Sonics bench.
Delonte West is set to return from injury, and will take the active roster spot from Sene. West will begin his return to action playing shooting guard.
The pressure is on Earl Watson and Luke Ridnour to earn playing time everyday at the point guard position with the return of West. West, Ridniur, and Watson, have limitations that prevent each of them from being the everyday starting point guard. The question for the team to answer is: Which two of the three players can make the most out if one position?
January will be the first time the team can see all three in extended game-time situations. That gives the team about six weeks before the NBA trade deadline to evaluate who they want to keep, and showcase who they do not..

Have a great holiday!
Mr Baker

Sent from my iPhone

December 21, 2007

Sonics | OKC mayor wants vote to overhaul Ford Center

SEATTLE - Clay Bennett called OKC Mayor Mick Cornett a visionary for his plan to hold a public vote on a 1 cent sales tax to pay for a $100 million dollar remodel of the Ford Center before the league votes on Bennett's request to relocate.
1. Good luck selling a one cent tax vote to remodel an arena without knowing if they will have a team to fill it. For some time we've heard the great and wonderous things OKC can do. Bennett has said that he would need a new arena in OKC, but a remodel is visionary? WTF!
2. Bennett has decided that he wants to move, but moving is not up to him. That explains that voting thing.
3. Bennett has yet to meet with the mayor of Seattle, and has dismissed without explination anything to do with the Key Arena site, explain that to the other owners.
4. If Seattle can provide a better source of revenue, OKC might not get the votes.
5. Welcome your 2009-10 OKC Hornets!


Have a great day,
Mr. Baker

Sent from my iPhone

December 06, 2007

So obvious, even an idiot can see it - NBA- msnbc.com

SEATTLE - Sam Smith @ MSNBC speculates (I can't call what he does anything else) that the Hornets team is being wasted in New Orleans. I agree, and didn't ever see NO as anything but the Saints town. Now with a trimmed down population that have more important things to tend to than propping up a franchise that didn't have the fan support before Katrina, and the insulting response from The "White" House by not doing the Right Thing, I don't know if they can embrace even a winning NBA team.
The locals are reaching for the familiar, the history, that is the Saints (that's what it looks like from far away) and maybe they are not reaching for the historically newer Hornets. Maybe things will change, the team is worth watching now, and maybe now isn't the time. What about next year, or the end of next year? At what point does the city not embracing the team the way they do so much else in NO indicate that the Hornets are, or not, making it there?

For the Hornets, they have some fans still following the team, still wanting them (not just some team, but the Hornets) back in Oklahoma City. If OKC is willing to open its arms and wallets to Bennett and the strangers right now (and forever) called the Sonics, then why not the Hornets? Shin has the track record there to get the right to ask. If he waits too long then that option is closed, too soon and the NBA looks bad. What about at the end of next year? That's the point, make or break, where Shin can go back to OKC if things are not working out in New Orleans, after a good faith effort (a real one, not a Bennett one).

This, and many things, hang on the Sonics and the City of Seattle's results in the court. If, as anybody can reasonably conclude from reading the arena lease, that the Sonics are bound by the contract to play its regular season home games in Key Arena through 2010, then the Hornets have a choice to make before that time.

And, as so many things depend on this, the Sonics have an offer from Seattle to keep them here into the future and draw more revenue for the league and team than they could if they were moved, then why move them?
Would the league deny itself and the owner of the franchise that has already shown that they have a fan base in OKC more revenue? At the same time, would the league allow itself and the franchise less revenue just to make one owner a local hero?

I don't think the fans in OKC care one way or another, maybe they care more for the team they hosted.
In this fuzzy furure I can clearly see the Hornets in OKC in 2010, and the Sonics in Seattle for a very long time. Owners come and go, they do, franchises do not, not with the same frequency. I don't go to the games to cheer on the owners, never. Rashard Lewis played under three owner's contracts here.

If the Hornets are not making it by 2009, and a plan is on the table in Seattle, then I don't see the NBA moving two teams to solve one revenue problem. I think the application to relocate has as much to do with Bennett beating Shin to the OKC market before it is shut off to him, that explains the early attempt to relocate to me. They knew before they took ownership that they would loose money through 2010, but less than a year into it they freak out over money? Bullshit! They are playing that card now because they have to now, before Shin.

This, as always, comes down to Seattle providing a better option to stay than to move, no matter what anybody else does, or what any idiot says about it, including Sam Smith, even if he is right for many of the wrong reasons.


Have a great day,
Mr Baker

Sent from my iPhone

December 02, 2007

Back to Ballmer, or Some Other Courtside Billionaire

SEATTLE - Seve Kellley in today's SEATTLE Times openly asks Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to step in and champion the cause for the Sonics and Seattle to be together forever, in an open letter to Mr Ballmer.


"So I guess this is where you come in.

I believe the Sonics' move to Oklahoma City is a long way from being a done deal. A long way.

I know that, from Olympia to the Seattle City Council, bubbling under the surface, there are movers and shakers, trying to put together an arena deal that works, whether it's a remodeled Key or something new at the Seattle Center or elsewhere.

Hoop lovers with deep pockets and/or friends in the NBA hierarchy are meeting and texting and talking on their phones, trying to figure out ways to save the Sonics.

I don't know if you have attended any games this season, but the fan reaction inside KeyArena has been remarkable. I wish Stern could take in a few games.

I mean here's a young team that will be lucky to win 25 games. A team that is 3-14 and lost its first seven home games before winning its first on Friday. But in the fourth quarter of close games — and almost every home game has been close — these fans, who have been orphaned by the league, are on their feet.

They're cheering this team as if they can see into the future. They chant "Save Our Sonics" every night. They haven't given up.

But I think they need someone with your clout to give them hope. I know the national pundits need someone with your clout just to say, "Not so fast. We ain't done yet."

It's easy for someone with no money like me to tell someone like you how to spend your money. It's presumptuous as well.

This city's legion of basketball fans, however, needs a hero besides Kevin Durant. It needs you to say, "I love the game as much as you guys do and I'm here to help."

I know there is a lot of work left to do. But I'm tired of Stern bad-mouthing this city, even if it is just a negotiating trick. And I think Stern and the rest of the basketball-loving nation need to know the real story.

Basketball isn't dead yet in Seattle. The Seattle Sonics have a pulse. You, Mr. Ballmer, and other ardent gamers like you, must fight for this team.

Seattle needs someone with muscle to go public. Someone like you, who, according to my scouts, knows how the game is played.

Will you help? Please."
Read An open letter to Microsoft CEO and hoop maven Steve Ballmer here!


Thanks go to Mr Kelley for going directly and openly to a court-side billionaire to ask for help.
About a year ago I openly speculated that the team's fate could be tied to Back to Ballmer, or Some Other Court-side Billionaire.

June 12, 2006
I just believe this to be the case.

There was a rumor last year that Trader Bob Whitsett was part of a group looking to buy the Sonics. That rumor didn't go far. Yesterday Ric Bucher said on ESPN radio, NBA Finals Pre-game show, that Trader Bob has surfaced with Microsoft money that doesn't belong to Paul Allen. trader Bob is looking to buy the Blazers. I'll guess that Trader Bob will buy the Sonics with somebody else's money after his attempts to get control of the Blazers is thwarted. The selling price will be absurd, but that's ok since it isn't Bob's money he is spending, again.

I just believe this to be the case. Steve Ballmer sits courtside. I have wondered for a few years if he would have the desire to get involved with the Sonics mess.
Link back to the story here.


I don't think I have to tie Steve Kelley to Bob Whitsett for you.